Multiple Realizability (MR) must still be regarded as one of the principal arguments against type reductionist accounts of higher-order properties and their special laws. Against this I argue that there is no unique MR but rather a multitude of MR categories. In a slogan: MR is itself “multi-realized”. If this is true then we cannot expect one unique reductionist strategy against MR as an anti-reductionist argument. The main task is rather to develop a taxonomy of the wide variety of MR cases and to sketch possible reductionist answers for each class of cases. The paper outlines some first steps in this direction
Multiple realizability seems to be empirically justified and provides the conceptual basis for the a...
Abstract: This article explains the concept of multiple realizability and its role in the philosoph...
Jerry Fodor has argued that the multiple realizability argument, as discussed in his original “Speci...
Multiple Realizability (MR) must still be regarded as one of the principal arguments against type re...
Multiple realizability (MR) is traditionally conceived of as the feature of computational systems, a...
Multiply realizable properties are those whose realizers are physically diverse. It is often argued ...
In recent decades, a number of authors have relied on the multiple realizability argument to reject ...
Multiple realisation prompts the question: how is it that multiple systems all exhibit the same phen...
Multiple realisation prompts the question: how is it that multiple systems all exhibit the same phen...
property counterpart theory Perhaps the most compelling argument against the possibility of fundamen...
This paper addresses the recent resurgence of Nagel style reduction in the philosophical literature....
For nearly thirty years, there has been a consensus (at least in English-speaking countries) that re...
Multiply realizable kinds are scientifically problematic, for it appears that we should not expect d...
Hilary Putnam’s ‘Psychological Predicates’ (1967) represents the first formalization of the argument...
Polger i Shapiro uważają, że zjawiska wielorako realizowalne niemal nie występują w rzeczywistości. ...
Multiple realizability seems to be empirically justified and provides the conceptual basis for the a...
Abstract: This article explains the concept of multiple realizability and its role in the philosoph...
Jerry Fodor has argued that the multiple realizability argument, as discussed in his original “Speci...
Multiple Realizability (MR) must still be regarded as one of the principal arguments against type re...
Multiple realizability (MR) is traditionally conceived of as the feature of computational systems, a...
Multiply realizable properties are those whose realizers are physically diverse. It is often argued ...
In recent decades, a number of authors have relied on the multiple realizability argument to reject ...
Multiple realisation prompts the question: how is it that multiple systems all exhibit the same phen...
Multiple realisation prompts the question: how is it that multiple systems all exhibit the same phen...
property counterpart theory Perhaps the most compelling argument against the possibility of fundamen...
This paper addresses the recent resurgence of Nagel style reduction in the philosophical literature....
For nearly thirty years, there has been a consensus (at least in English-speaking countries) that re...
Multiply realizable kinds are scientifically problematic, for it appears that we should not expect d...
Hilary Putnam’s ‘Psychological Predicates’ (1967) represents the first formalization of the argument...
Polger i Shapiro uważają, że zjawiska wielorako realizowalne niemal nie występują w rzeczywistości. ...
Multiple realizability seems to be empirically justified and provides the conceptual basis for the a...
Abstract: This article explains the concept of multiple realizability and its role in the philosoph...
Jerry Fodor has argued that the multiple realizability argument, as discussed in his original “Speci...